Copyright © 2018 Living Media India Limited. For reprint rights: Syndications Today.

Mark Knight's Serena Williams cartoon is funny. But how did we miss that?

Racism or sexism may not be the villain always. But outrage is.

Racism or sexism may not be the villain always. But outrage is.

Every time we cry foul over tennis goddess Serena Williams being victimised in a 'white man’s game', we fail as Serena fans. More than anyone else, we reinforce the glass ceilings she has smashed long before. Yet, the rage of the fans across the world seems to have enough fire to threaten Australian cartoonist Mark Knight enough for him to have deleted his Twitter account facing huge backlash after he sketched a Serena cartoon on the Herald Sun.

Should cartoons come with a disclaimer now? (Photo: AP)

According to Knight, his family members were being abused on social media, following his ‘racist’ caricature of Serena, which, as he said, was just about bad behaviour, not at all about race or gender.

So, Serena William’s loss to Naomi Osaka at the US Open 2018 last Saturday has, as expected, far-reaching impact — and collateral damage.

A lot has happened since Saturday. But nothing, absolutely nothing, exuded true sportsperson spirit. Nothing.

When a winner was made to cry: Can this be the only memory of this US Open final? (Photo: Reuters)

Naomi Osaka had to actually apologise after her victory as the audience was not prepared for Serena’s defeat. Serena’s vitriolic protest against umpire Carlos Ramos’ decision was described as ‘tantrums’ and her fit of rage as ‘meltdown’. Then came Mark Knight’s cartoon, which was immediately shredded to pieces for being 'racist' and 'sexist'. Even Amul’s cartoon, filled with its usual buttery cuteness, drew ire for the accompanying text on Twitter: #Amul Topical: Ms William’s tantrums in US Open Finals', because of the use of the word tantrums.


Going by the dictionary meaning, a 'cartoon' is a simple drawing, showing the features of its subjects in a humorously exaggerated way, especially a satirical one in a newspaper or magazine.

So, a cartoon has to be cheeky and exaggerated, rendered in the signature style of the cartoonist. That’s what makes a cartoon different from a portrait. At the same time, it must have a semblance with reality. We have seen political outrage over cartoon — fan outrage is not so common.

In this cartoon, Serena’s lips and tongue have been exaggerated while she is seen stomping on her racket in anger. (Serena smashed her racket on Saturday, inviting a penalty). Not too far away, Osaka, a small, frail figure, is seen standing looking lost, while the umpire is telling her, “Can you just let her win?”

So, what exactly enraged millions on Twitter, including JK Rowling and Masaba Gupta, who came down heavily on the cartoon, posing questions to the very freedom of art?

Are people outraging over a ‘butch and fat-lipped’ cartooned Serena not taking this cartoon with a lot more seriousness than the US Open finale?

A newspaper stand displaying the Herald Sun which features a sharp comeback on its front page today. (Photo: REUTERS/Melanie Burton)

The newspaper has reprinted the same cartoon, with many other cartoons to show that they have never been biased against Serena.

But seriously, is this the way we are heading?

Everything, everyone has to be 'politically correct' — except Serena fans who actually do a disservice to Serena’s prowess every time they pick up a petty fight — be it booing Naomi, or abusing Mark Knight.

A case of highly confused priorities.

Booing before praising. Cartoon ahead of the real person.

Also read: A new champion is born in Naomi Osaka: An epitome of dignity and grace under partisan fire

Related Stories