dailyO
Politics

Juvenile Justice Amendment Bill passed by RS, stuck on Twitter

Advertisement
DailyBite
DailyBiteDec 23, 2015 | 10:34

Juvenile Justice Amendment Bill passed by RS, stuck on Twitter

Barely a day after the juvenile rapist of December 16 gang rape and murder victim, Jyoti Singh Pandey, better known as Nirbhaya, was released from custody, Rajya Sabha passed the Juvenile Justice Amendment Bill (JJ Bill) on December 22, after a massive uproar from different walks of society.

The JJ Bill, which was brought in by the Union minister of women and child development, Maneka Gandhi, in August 2014, had been passed by Lok Sabha in May this year, but had been pending in Rajya Sabha because of earlier parliamentary logjam.

Advertisement

However, with the staggering hue and cry raised by Asha Devi, Jyoti’s mother, and her repeated pleadings to not release the juvenile convict, which were in turn taken up by DCW chief Swati Maliwal only to be set aside by both Delhi High Court and Supreme Court of India, finally resulted in the Bill being passed by the House of Elders. 

In fact, BJP members of Parliament had assured Asha Devi that they would try pass the Bill on December 22, with mainstream media playing her calls for justice on a loop. While Maneka Gandhi made a passionate plea in the Rajya Sabha, and thanked it once the controversial Bill was cleared, the Left parties staged a walk out and refrained from voting because they wanted the Bill to be referred to a standing committee, citing its violations of UNHRC conventions on fundamental and child rights.

Advertisement

Importantly, the Justice Verma panel, set up to bolster the criminal procedure code, too, was against lowering of the age for trying juvenile delinquents. 

Key takeaways from the passage of the Juvenile Justice Amendment Bill are as follows:

A. Juveniles aged 16-18 may be tried as adults

Now juveniles between 16-18 years convicted in a heinous crime may face a maximum of seven years in (adult) jail, if the Juvenile Justice Board concludes that the juvenile convict was of sound mental and psychological conditions while committing the crime.

Advertisement

B. #CrimeNotAge divides legislators, activists

According to WCD minister Maneka Gandhi, crimes, particularly sexual and violent crimes, committed by juveniles have shot up, which is reason enough to lower the age for criminals getting harsher punishments in the court of law. #CrimeNotAge trended all day, with many politicians, particularly from the BJP and TMC, including TMC MP Derek O’ Brien, making emotional pitches to pass the pending JJ Bill. 

C. Left-liberals staunchly opposed to Bill

However, their claims have been contradicted by human rights organisations such as Amnesty India, Human Rights Watch, Child Rights and You, as well as legislators such as Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, Left leaders Sitaram Yechury, Brinda Karat, among others, who have been vociferously opposed to the Bill. They main argument is that juveniles between 16-18 do not have psychological restraint to control their actions, which are imitations of what they see around them. 

The Juvenile Justice Act 2000, which will be replaced by the JJ Bill once it gets the president’s assent, had a strict limit of three years in a correctional facility in case the juvenile committed a serious or heinous offence. The focus was on reparative justice, and not punitive measures. The JJ Bill will change that, and might particularly impact juvenile delinquents from the poorer classes.

Last updated: December 23, 2015 | 10:34
IN THIS STORY
Please log in
I agree with DailyO's privacy policy