The basis of Article 35A and Article 370 is to protect J&K’s demography. But from what? The rest of India? From non-Muslims? 35A is based purely on discrimination. Imagine if such an Act existed in the rest of the country.
Facing internal rivals and external pressures, the politicians of the Valley are stoking separatist feelings, uncaring of how this will impact life post-elections in Kashmir.
Many Kashmiris have Pakistani wives who attained state subject rights upon marriage, as did their children. But J&K women who married non state people lost all their rights.
Petrol pumps are running dry, people are scrambling to stock groceries and vegetables. The Pulwama attack is leaving deep scars on the Kashmiri psyche.
Many experts believe there is a serious risk of poor voter turnout which would be seen as a referendum against the Indian state.
Regional parties boycotting polls is obstructing democracy at the grassroots level.
Kashmiriyat is not just an expression; it is a way of life which respects religious diversity.
Such moves only deepen the sense of alienation on the ground and push Kashmiri youths towards militancy.
According to the petition that challenges Article 35A, J&K's special status is 'discriminatory'.
The National Conference (NC) with the Congress disenfranchised J&K. PDP leader Mehbooba Mufti tried to guard against tinkering with crucial Articles.
Sign In With Twitter
