Anusha Soni

What lies beneath this controversy is a clash of top democratic institutions, each asserting its authority over the other.

The basis of the law is that wife is a chattel or a property of man.

The government, which is internally divided on the issue, doesn't want the schisms to be out in the open.

With justice Arjan Kumar Sikri's entry into the collegium, the dynamics are set to change.

The governor's office is expected to exercise constitutional and political morality because it's an office that by far is beyond the purview of the courts.

She invariably opened up a debate about moral policing and formal dress code.

The date for the next collegium meeting has not been decided yet.

The will leave the Indian judiciary in a worse position.

The apex court is not just faced with constitutional questions, but also a crisis of faith.

The courts have always protected our democracy and the Constitution, and when they failed, we called it Emergency.

The move is unprecedented since no CJI has has ever faced impeachment in the country.

The silence after the historic four judges' press conference should not be construed as all is well within the judiciary.

The law seems to be struggling to strike a utopian balance between the rights of the accused and protection of underprivileged.

Why did it take the court so long to comprehend that criminal aspersions on Shafin Jahan, or anyone else, cannot be the reason to lock up a 24-year-old woman?

It’s strange that the ‘master of the roster’ has assigned himself the sole discretion to hear public interest litigations and letter petitions.

Whether the loud voices are capable of making legally tenable arguments, or the truth will get drowned out?

The language used in a rape trial is an important component in the entire process of justice delivery.

It was expected that the issue would be resolved over the weekly informal lunch, but justice Chelameswar chose to be on leave.

When top four judges of the SC see no recourse but to address the media, we are indeed in for troubled times.

In a criminal trial, to prove criminal intent one requires to prove the guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The five-judge Constitution bench of Supreme Court will begin hearing the Aadhaar case in January.

The Kerala 'love jihad' case is a classic example of how misogyny and phobia feed off each other.

The court said the conduct of Prashant Bhushan was 'unethical' and amounted to 'forum shopping'.